(excerpt from my
journal entry dated March 20, 2012)
. . . And then I remembered the issue with the Azkals, the
Philippine football team. Right now, they have a sexual harassment case (there
are two, actually), and in his commentary, Arnold Clavio, a broadcast
journalist, pointed out how abusive the Azkals were of their fame. Arnold even went
on to say (or so I think) that they’re not really Filipinos but just pretending
to be Filipinos. Of course, the Philippine Football Association found this to
be a racist remark.
I saw the Arnold Clavio video on Youtube. In the comments section,
I remember one viewer commenting that the the Azkals members (most of whom are
half-Filipino half-foreigners) did not have to represent the Philippines yet
are doing so out of their own efforts and finances (so they say) and for that we
should be thankful to them at least, and that if there be a case against them,
just let the courts decide on the matter, etc.
Now, I do not have to agree or disagree on anything about
the issue (as if I have a say on this and what I have to say would matter). I
just remember Michio Kaku’s video about what keeps America afloat despite the
rise in the “stupid” index of its populace. Kaku says it’s due to the US government’s H-1B
Genius visa, which basically employs highly skilled immigrants in various
industries and provides them the option to become US citizens once their tenure
is over. Of course, along with that are the many opportunities and privileges,
which most Americans tend to be complacent about.
While Americans take their opportunities and privileges for
granted, highly skilled immigrants tend to take advantage of those. And when
they excel, they are urged to stay and are given even more privileges. Canada
does that, too, and among such privileges is free education (with allowance)
from grade school to high school for children (although I think Canada does
that to keep their people from leaving and living somewhere else).
I’m wondering, why can’t we do the same thing here? For the
right people, I mean. Which is not to say that the Azkals are not the right
people. What I’m saying is why not invite over, say, a hard-nut tree-hugger and
make him/her head of (or at least consultant to) the DENR?
Not that our local tree-huggers do not have the
qualification. It’s just that, more than the technical know-how, we need people
who are almost “maniacal” for the task. Maniacal so as to be above the
politics. Maniacal so as to be above the corruption and the culture of padrino and
maƱana. In short, WE NEED ROLE MODELS(!!!!!!) because the role models we have
currently are too close to be familiar (and familiarity breeds
understanding—and “understanding” in this country is often abused).
[Note: I
think “technocracy” is the term for this, but you can form your own
conclusions. Follow this link, if you like: http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2011/11/2011111675931523936.html]
We can do the same in other departments, say, crime scene
investigation or garbage management. I mean, our 5-star hotels hire foreign
chefs for their kitchens, and private companies do that for their operations, why
can’t our government do the same?
Of course, this will be met with opposition from so-called “nationalists”
who will allude to Filipino pride being stepped on. But when you think closely
on it, you realize there’s just no way that national pride be involved in this.
National pride is not equivocal to a Filipino’s individual pride. In the end, it’s
just all in a day’s work.
Ang hirap kasi sa karamihan
ng mga Pinoy porke matagal na daw sila sa trabaho, dapat mataas na daw ang
sweldo at posisyon nila sa isang kumpanya. They resent those who, although
new to the company, are promoted because they show a lot of promise and excel. ‘Yan din ang problema sa mga rights at sa pag-a-uphold sa mga rights.
Not all men are created equal. In God’s eyes siguro, oo. Pero kasi sa mundong ginagalawan
natin, may mga exemptions. ‘Yung mga
disabled (or differently abled) halimbawa,
our society has more lenience toward them. Equality ba yun? The truth that we’re not all equal means that our rights
and privileges should not be equally extended and applied. These rights come
with responsibilities and so I think only those who are “responsible”—or who can
live up to the responsibility—should enjoy them more.
No comments:
Post a Comment